An independent judiciary

While reading a news article about the trial of former US President Trump, I was reminded of the crucial role played by an independent judiciary. Specifically, I was struck by the recent verdict granting the President a certain level of immunity, which has sparked division among both the media and the public. 

In the United States, judges are nominated by the executive branch, resulting in clear party affiliations among those who are selected. As a result, judgments for similar crimes may vary depending on both the judges’ political leanings and those accused in court.

This issue is not unique to America; many countries worldwide have their judicial appointments influenced by politicians. In India, for instance, there have been instances of judges joining political parties shortly after retiring from their judicial roles. Furthermore, some nations base their judgments on religious codes that were established centuries ago – rules and guidelines that may no longer be relevant or suitable for governing in today’s world.

The critical question raised by all this is: where does the separation of powers come into play? When one branch appoints or influences another branch, it undermines and dilutes the very essence of democracy itself.